Powered by Blogger.
RSS
Showing posts with label historic. Show all posts
Showing posts with label historic. Show all posts

Historic Arlington, TX: The Old Mayor's House

"The Old Mayor's House" 814 E. Abram St., Arlington, TX

(DISCLAIMER: This article is actually a heavily stripped-down, low-res version of a preservation presentation I had to prepare for my architecture class. These images are welcome for non-commercial use, especially students and historic preservation sites. If you want the high-resolution photos or the 4-meg Power Point presentation, contact me for details. ) The Powerpoint presentation is chronologically organized and includes the context. This blog entry article is more about the difficult journey of trying to get the information before the PPT was ever put together.)

Our professor wanted to expose us to the Preservation side of architecture. Arlington, Texas has a number of historical sites scattered about. Of course, one must keep in mind that "historic" in the DFW Metroplex means it's older than about 50 years old, once again proving Eddie Izzard correct when he makes fun of us.

"We've restored this building to the way it looked over FIFTY YEARS AGO!!!"

"Surely not! No one was alive back then!"


Now, granted, we don't have any buildings that one can literally rent or buy that someone built before the advent of Monotheism. And one would be hard pressed to even find a building constructed before the 1900's over here. Be that as it may, we are slowly gaining an appreciation for our own history, so long as it doesn't get in the way of gigantic sports stadiums, theme parks, car dealerships, parking lots, or anyone with a large enough wad of cash to make us forget that maybe there was a reason for that quaint old place to stay there.

The Arlignton Historical Society seeks to preserve what few historic landmarks remain in "The Heart of Arlington," and our duty for this assignment was to help them present a case for preserving certain structures. I chose "The Old Mayor's House" on 814 E. Abram Street. I also had no idea what I was in for. For one thing, aside from this article that you are reading right now, you won't find a single reference to it on the web except for a tiny blurb on a scanned in 1-liner next to a single current-day photo, from a pamplet advertising to tour historic Arlington. Go ahead and look, this article will be here when you come back...

...

...Done looking? I couldn't even find a reference to the current owner. I tried contacting the Historical Society and received no answer. So far the only information I had been able to find out was from that one liner blurb on the pamplet.


The only other thing online about The Old Mayor's House

On a hunch, my professor gave me the name and number of a very kind woman named Geraldine who was able to give me the current owner's name (Xavier Carrillo) and the greenlight to visit the site. Meanwhile, I visited the University of Texas at Arlington Special Collections archives to see if I could find anything at all about the building. My search turned up absolutely nothing. I found one photo of the 800 block of East Abrams, but it was taken between 1910-1915, and according to the pamplet, the house was built in 1928, and the archives were closing for the evening.

The next morning, I visited the site to find it was currently a Tax Specialist office.

So, I headed along to the side of the office to get a better look.



It is a beautiful house, well restored Tudor-Revival House with what appears to be Mid-Atlantic Tan brickwork and stained-glass windows. The place has a very loved, well-manicured look about it. I head to the front and find it closed. Then I realize the driveway actually leads to a parking lot in back. Perhaps that would be where I need to park and enter through the back. No such luck, it's closed and locked too.

Geraldine had greenlit my taking photos of the house, but I wanted to be extra careful not to offend anyone, so I called the non-emergency line for the Arlington Police Department, and informed them of what I was doing. For any students of architecture, history, photography, etc. Whenever you have to study a site, it's always a very good idea to let the police know exactly what you are doing, why, for how long, what you are wearing, and so forth. Otherwise, at best you might merely be stopped by the police and inconvenienced for half an hour while they figure out if your story is legit. At worst, you might get shot for trespassing by a panicked owner. My conscience clear, I stepped out of the car and got as many exterior photos as I could.

The front photos aside, one thing I noticed is the house is now ADA Compliant. Complete with a handicapped parking spot, a ramp. The house also now has a fire escape as a method of egress. Both would be required for a business, technically, but doing so is always difficult because one ultimately risks damage to the historic nature of the house, the look and spirit of the place can become ruined. I think in this case, they did quite a good job. The ramp access is in back, so that the front of the house is preserved, and yet it gives easy access and parking. I noticed on the side opposite the driveway was a very picturesque garden, and had to take a closer look.

Wow. Makes me wish I had one of these. What looks like a roof is actually a portico with a trellis, and a thick layer of foliage along the top. The flagstone, arches, greenery, and shade makes a great refuge from the heat and noise of the house's unfortunate surrounding context of auto shops, convenience stores, and fast food chains.

I took another couple of pictures when sure enough, someone approached me to see what I was about. I explained my situation as honestly as possible and it turned out she was the property manager, had access to the interior, and would be happy to show me around the place. She even knew of a few old photos of the place and a few articles. I had struck archival gold!

The first thing she showed me was a couple of photos of the place before it had been bought and restored by Mr. Carrillo.


As you might be able to tell, the two front corners of the house had been cut out and replaced with large plate glass display windows. That's because it had been a dress shop before it had been purchased by Mr. Carrillo. It also had no central heating and air conditioning. It had no driveway, no parking lot in back, and the whole house itself, though handsome, was in a considerable state of disrepair. But Xavier Carrillo had seen promise in the place, and sought to restore its original beauty. He did a great job. In fact, he did so well, they gave him an award.

The property was acquired by Xavier Carrillo in 1993, who renovated it over 9 months, and won the top honor "Excellence Award" in urban design in 1994 for revitalization of a city landmark. Here's a partial list of what he did:
  • Original slate roof was restored, though in 2006 had to be replaced with a standard composite roof due to prohibitive cost.
  • Plate glass window on northwest corner was replaced with brick.
  • Plate glass window on southwest corner replaced by arched window to match the rest of the house’s theme.
  • Back porch portico converted into interior space with large arched windows.
  • House completely rewired.
  • Brick was cleaned.
  • Central A/C and Heating installed.
  • ADA ramp installed.
  • Arbor, curbs, sidewalks, and a drive for rear parking were all installed.
The property manager also showed me a few photos and articles of other houses restored by Mr. Carrillo, which looked great. He apparently restores historic landmarks as a personal hobby, and one at which I must say he's become quite proficient. I asked if they had any older photos or information on the house, at which point the Property Manager directed me to this painting.

What you are looking at now is a painting of the house as it would have looked prior to the crude re-purposing the dress shop had inflicted on the property (~1950's). As you can see, there is a significant difference in the look of the place. The artist is a miss Gretchen Schwab, who painted this in 1996 as a gift for Mr. Carrillo. The east (left) part of the house is shown as an open porch with an arched portico which has since been converted into internal space with arched windows and an external portico added. And, of course, no tacky plate glass display windows.

As previously mentioned, Carrillo internalized the arched portico space, converting it into a great connecting rear foyer. The room is beautifully decorated and the brickwork matches the rest of the house perfectly. The third photo you see used to be the back door leading to the portico.

This is the other side of that door. We are now in the signing room, what would at one time have been the formal dining room. It is, likewise, beautifully done.

The fireplace is gas. I never did get a final answer on whether or not the actual framework of it is original or not.

The dining room sports a simple, but elegantly vaulted ceiling...

...with the original chandelier, which I later found out was designed by the home's architect.

The stained glass windows are all original, as are the arched doorways. I'm not certain whether or not the doors themselves are, however. When I was attempting to get a better shot of the front door, I saw this:

When I asked about it, the PM told me it used to be a phone booth, and that Mr. Carrillo had decided to leave it like it was. As it turns out, this was an incredibly wise decision. When I returned to the UTA Special Collections Archives later that day, I decided to change my tactic, and search for things relating to "The Old Mayor" rather than the house. Barney C. Barnes was mayor from 1947 to 1951, and is the person the house got it's nickname from. By odd coincidence, he was also instrumental in getting UTA up and running, though it wasn't called UTA at the time. Perhaps one of those photos, articles, or books somewhere would have something about the house.

I should take a moment to mention that searching through Special Collections archives is a painfully slow task. In an age where high-speed wireless internet access and streaming video of nearly everything in the world is available on most modern cell phones, the archives are like a black hole of knowledge which never escapes to the digital world. Hardcopies are actually stored according to how many linear feet they take up. Checking out even one single item requires first thumbing through literal pages upon pages of finding-aids, guessing at what box might have something about what you're looking for, filling out a form, waiting for it to be processed, the box to be looked up, carted out, gloves worn to manually examine the contents one at a time. The vast, vast majority of the time you will not find what you are looking for, and will have to start the process all over again.

Assuming you do find a photo, article, or anything else that you would like, you will need to fill out two additional forms, wait for them to be processed. The item you wish to have copied will need to be returned internally to a special lab where you might see your copy in about half an hour if you are lucky enough to only need a xerox of an article or post card. If you actually need a scan of a photo, it will cost you six dollars per copy and a few days wait. These areas are also typically only open during normal business hours.

I don't say this to denigrate the UTA Special Collections by any means. They have their processes in place for very good reasons, and serve a vital purpose to researchers. What I wish to convey to the reader is that this type of research will not only seem alien to you if you've never done it before, but it is also not a quick process. Should you ever have a project that requires access to a Special Collections archive, expect it to take days to find even one relevent item.

Well, as it turns out, after three visits, there just happened to be a book (thus only a 30 minute wait for the reproduction) on historic politics in Arlington that had a photo of Mayor Barnes...

Recognize that phone booth? Now look closely at the phone. It's a rotary-dial phone, as opposed to a crank-switch. And why on Earth would someone have taken a photo of the mayor on the phone, at his house, while he obviously poses for the shot?

I found the answer about two hours later, thumbing through the Special Collections' randomly clipped and saved articles from the Fort Worth Star Telegram.

There's more to the article, but there's the important part. Or most of the important part. It turns out that, for at least a brief time, thanks to a deal brokered by B. C. Barnes, Arlington had the most advanced phone system on Earth, and that the very first use of that new phone system was at none other than the Mayor's house, at 814 E. Abram St. So, the age of the building aside (over 80 years old), there is reason number two for its preservation: an historically significant event, and photo documentation to prove it. Reason number three came after I'd finally gotten in contact with Mr. Carrillo, who, in addition to answering some questions about the house, had remembered that it had been built by a Mr. Hutsell. A bit more investigation finally gave me the name of the architect, Clifford D. Hutsell.

Clifford D. Hutsell was a rather prolific architect in the Dallas area. After a trip to California in 1929, he was an architect specializing in Spanish Colonial revival style. His flamboyant style typically incorporated multi-colored ceramic tile, wide-arched stained glass windows, balcony porches, exterior stairs, and several houses of his together in a row would seem to fit together like a jigsaw puzzle. He is credited as the primary architectural influence in the Lakewood County Club District as well as Highland Park--two of the most exclusive neighborhoods in Dallas. However, before he left for California, he was not an architect, but merely a Grapevine-born city planner who had tried his hand at designing two houses. One was at 1306 W. Abram St. The other was at 814 E. Abram St., designed for a certain cattle baron (Dave Martin) who had inherited a patch of land. The house was later sold to W. T. Waggoner (the richest man West of the Mississippi) who built Arlington’s 1st and only Horse Racing Track.

So, there are two more previously unknown reasons for its preservation. The architect was a native-born Texan (an extreme rarity for the time, as most of our architects came from "Damned Yankee States"), and was a major architectural influence on the area. The last reason is because of the figures of note who lived there, (Waggoner and Barnes). Thus, the case for preservation is made. I will be producing a CD with my powerpoint, findings, and original photos for myself, the UTA Special Collections, and Mr. Carrillo, should anyone need more information. This article was primarily about the journey. The powerpoint is far more succinct and chronological.

  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • RSS

Historic Dallas Part 3: Dealey Plaza

For most people, the name "Dealey Plaza" is a grim reminder of the assassination of John F. Kennedy. But it has a rich history and is the true birthplace of Dallas, Texas. Part 3 of "Historic Dallas" shows this National Landmark designed by landscape architects Sidney J. Hare and S. Herbert Hare of Kansas City, Missouri. The choice of Hare and Hare was actually quite a logical one, as they had a hand in designing many Texas parks, especially throughout the Houston area.

Stepping out from the Big Old Red Museum, the view of Dealey Plaza is sublimely framed by the blue granite arches. The statue seen standing is of late Dallas Morning News publisher George B. Dealey. It was sculpted by Felix de Weldon (the same sculptor who crafted "The Flag Raising On Iwo Jima") and inside the granite base is a metal box with documents relating to his life. It might be of interest to know that originally the statue was supposed to be of Robert E. Lee on horseback, but four years previous it was decided the Lee statue would be placed in Oak Lawn.

Behind the statue are four bronze-reliefs (also by de Weldon) in a semi-circle, each depicting a different interest of Dealey's, and behind it, a concrete pergola. This concrete pergola theme is repeated throughout the plaza. Off in the distance on the left-hand side is the famous Reunion Tower. To the right of the pergola stands a base with a plaque that reads:

"Dealey Plaza
Birthplace of Dallas
Within this small park was built the first home, which also served as the first courthouse and postoffice[sic], the first store and the first fraternal lodge. Dedicated to the pioneers of civic progress by order of the Park Board."

It's important to know that locals pronounce it as "Day-lee" rather than "Dee-lee". If you walk into a store and ask about "Deelee Plaza" they will most likely not know what you are talking about. Also, the "first fraternal lodge" mentioned in the plaque actually refers to the first Masonic Lodge in Dallas.


Looking left of the statue, we see a beautiful reflecting pool, again with Reunion Tower behind it.

Looking to the right, across the street, a nearly identical pergola stands. In lieu of a statue is a large segmented concrete pillar monument.

Unfortunately, immediately after capturing this image, the camera battery ran out and I wasn't carrying a spare. At some point, I'll have to revisit Dealey Plaza at night, as I hear it's beautiful. I'll probably visit the JFK Memorial Plaza at the same time. When I do, I'll also go through and try to capture the bronze relief plates. There were several more photos I would have liked to take.

  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • RSS

Historic Dallas Part 2: Old Red Courthouse

In Part 2 of our ongoing series of historic Dallas architecture, we visit the grand "Old Red Courthouse," or locally known as "Big Ol' Red". It's currently a museum for Dallas County History & Culture, and "Big" doesn't really do it justice. The thing takes up an entire city block, and looks built to withstand a siege.

For a distance perspective on the size, it dwarfs the rather tall trees surrounding it, and even surrounded by skyscrapers, it cuts an impressive figure when driving into Dallas. And when you're right in front of it, it feels like you're staring at a small mountain.

Of interesting note, the bell tower and clock were not a part of the original design. They were added on after the plans had been drawn up, but before the building stage completed. And unfortunately the original plans were lost to fire. However, despite the same materials, theme, and arches being used, there is an underlying problem. Whoever thought a bell-tower could just be added on afterward didn't realize the added weight of the giant bell, the stress that swinging it would place upon the structure, or the damage that would result.

The tower was, thus, built with the look of the thing, but not the understanding of the necessary engineering skills. As such, use of the bell nearly destroyed the courthouse (as fires had so often done before).

Currently the tower is off-limits, the bell secured, and the top part is apparently so cracked and damaged that they dare not even try to repair it. How ironic that the gargoyle outside the belfry has a look of agony, with his fingers stuck in his ears.

The theme of arches recurs throughout the entire structure. The blue granite is a nice compliment to the red sandstone, and each arch outside the door frames a nice view of the surrounding plazas (such as the JFK Memorial Plaza, Dealey Plaza, and Founders Plaza), as well as some of the other buildings in Dallas. Below is the sign outside, transcribed for your convenience.

The Old Red Courthouse

Designated as public land in John Neely Bryan's 1844 City Plat, this was the site of a log courthouse built after a Dallas County was created in 1846. When Dallas won election as permanent county seat in 1850, Bryan deeded the property to the county and a larger log structure was erected in 1856. County offices occupied a 2-story brick edifice, rebuilt in 1860 after a fire that almost destroyed the city. The fourth courthouse, a 2-story granite structure erected in 1871 survived one fire in 1880 before it burned again in 1890.

The Old Red Courthouse, the fifth seat of county government, was begun in 1890 and completed in 1892. Designed by architect M. A. Orlopp, it exemplifies the Romanesque Revival style with its massive scale and rounded arches. The blue granite of the lower floor and window trim contrasts with the red sandstone of the upper stories. Eight circular turrets dominate the design. A clock tower with a 4500 pound bell originally topped the building, but it was removed in 1919. Two of the four clay figures perched on the roof have also been removed.

To house the expanding county government, a new courthouse was built in 1965. Some offices remained in the 1890's structure which was renovated in 1968.

The windows are consistent with the arch-theme throughout the entire structure, and each window carries the same blue granite on red sandstone throughout. The reflection in the window is of Reunion Tower (which I'll cover someday). Note how the weight is distributed along the blue granite, at the very tops of the arches, and at the bases upon which the arches stand. If you scroll back up and look at the massive doorway arches, you will see that almost all of the arch is granite. This is probably because sandstone could not bear the load.

The eight towers that accent the corners are actually glorified rotundas. There is no staircase or circular enclosed space where they join with the main structure, they are the main structure, simply curved outward, then styled to look like towers.

Nonetheless, the rotundas (and the towers they emulate) are decidedly beautiful, and arguably more functional, as the added space can be used in the rooms they are a part of.

Last, before a glance inward, the courthouse also boasted its own artesian well, now long dried-up and capped.

Just inside the entrance, one will find modern fixtures, new trim, paint, tile, and doors. Though the stained-glass window is original.

It's a beautiful example of work, and looks far more vibrant in person. The meaning behind it, if there ever was one, is unknown. Turning around to look at the interior, the effect is only partially spoiled by all the modern accouterments.

The Civil War Re-enactment Society was out in full force, recruiting in the lobby. They were very friendly and quite clear about their intent to honor the result of the Civil War, and have no desire to bring back slavery or to claim The South won. Considering the number of Civil War buffs in Texas, this is hardly surprising. What did, however, completely put me off was the giant glowing neon Pegasus that not only looks tacky as hell, but obscures the beautiful effect of concentric arches framing one another. It is apparently a permanent addition to the museum, and could not be more tastelessly displayed even if they'd added animatronic clowns to it.

The Mobile Pegasus also gets in the way of taking a decent photo of the grand staircase. My back is literally up against the glass case of the neon sign as I'm trying to get as much of the shot in camera as possible. You can actually pick up the glow of it behind me in the sign up ahead.

The stairs themselves are beautifully executed, and are a fine example of turn-of-the-century iron filigree. The stairs have very little in the way of support except for themselves and the floors and walls they connect to.

The row of arched windows seen in this photo is the reverse side of the wall from the earlier photo outside. Much natural light is let in, and then punctuated with the modern light fixtures. The central stair leads to a double-stair leading up to either side of the second floor. Interestingly, though, most of the second-floor is new. It apparently used to be a mezzanine instead, and it is entirely likely that the stairs led to a sort of gallery view of the lower floor. before progressing on to higher floors.

The vast majority of the stairs have all been reworked, as well as the tiles. However, the steps themselves still feature The Lone Star on a geometric field similar to the webbing on old dollar bills. This shot shows the filigree, "second story" tile, and the steps. This banister is original wood, though most of the rails have been replaced in the renovations.

A few parts of the museum have been deliberately left unfinished and untouched. What you see here are original local-clay tiles from the original structure. These used to line the ceiling of the rooms. Most are long-since gone, but these are plainly visible in the corner of one of the larger rooms. Even with max resolution in Photoshop I wasn't able to make out exactly what the tiles were supposed to be, but most likely if it was clay, it was a simple, easily stamped imprint, rather than something terribly ornate, as clay takes stamps a lot better than it takes etched lines.

If you look closely, you can actually see the faint outline of an arch in some walls where a door currently stands. These outlines have been deliberately left to demonstrate the layout of how the interior used to be where instead now, for practical reasons, a more closed, modern door was required.

Lastly, I wish to thank the museum staff, who were incredibly helpful and patient with all of my questions, and very tolerant of my shutterbugging. I thoroughly enjoyed myself and looking back at what architects were thinking over 100 years ago.

Be sure to check out tomorrow's feature as we examine Part 3 of Historic Dallas: Dealey Plaza.

  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • RSS
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...